DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**sobre** · 05-03-2007, 01:50 AM

Do you see the cockiness and arrogance of Rhandhular? Do you see him playing word games about the 47 columns? how many times did I say they left the 47 columns completely out of the report. Do you see how he picks an chooses on which topics to debate with me and neglects are great majority of them? Yet I address all of his.

Originally Posted by Conan21

Word games. Who is playing word games? Here is your original statement about the 47 columns

1) Why Did the 9/11 Commision's report not show the correct design of the WTC buildings when then were doing their dubunking? They completely left out the MANY Internal Support beams that ran through the center of the building that were a key component in the buildings safety design.

Originally Posted by Conan21

They didn't show any designs that I could find. None. Zero. Zilch. I asked what page these were on but Conan could not provide an answer. There is no reference to any of this in the 9/11 commission report and yet he maintains omissions were made. How can you omit something you don't cover? Note how the theory has changed from the original one.

He also states they were debunking conspiracy theories. I have clearly pointed out several times they made no attempt to debunk anything. It was not their intent to debunk anything.

Who is trying to mislead who?

05-03-2007, 01:50 AM	#52
sobre Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 382 Senior Member	Do you see the cockiness and arrogance of Rhandhular? Do you see him playing word games about the 47 columns? how many times did I say they left the 47 columns completely out of the report. Do you see how he picks an chooses on which topics to debate with me and neglects are great majority of them? Yet I address all of his. Originally Posted by Conan21 Word games. Who is playing word games? Here is your original statement about the 47 columns 1) Why Did the 9/11 Commision's report not show the correct design of the WTC buildings when then were doing their dubunking? They completely left out the MANY Internal Support beams that ran through the center of the building that were a key component in the buildings safety design. Originally Posted by Conan21 They didn't show any designs that I could find. None. Zero. Zilch. I asked what page these were on but Conan could not provide an answer. There is no reference to any of this in the 9/11 commission report and yet he maintains omissions were made. How can you omit something you don't cover? Note how the theory has changed from the original one. He also states they were debunking conspiracy theories. I have clearly pointed out several times they made no attempt to debunk anything. It was not their intent to debunk anything. Who is trying to mislead who? Last edited by Rhandhular; 05-03-2007 at 01:53 AM.
	Quote