Thread: 9/11 questions
View Single Post
Old 05-03-2007, 02:14 AM   #53
KuevDulin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
362
Senior Member
Default Hey buddy
I reclarified that statement several times b/c of all your bickering.

I'll do it one more time to clarify your trivial non sense.

To Ommit,not Cover,not discuss, leav out,deny, what every words you want to use.... the existance of 47 Huge Interal Core columns and not indicate how they fell is mind boggling. If they wanted to make it atleast look atleast some what honest they could have stated that were there but were uncertain how the fell. The Also just completed OMMITTED building 7 from the report.

However you want to look at it without playing word games-- They did an absolutely Horrible Job at addressing the events of 9/11 and do not address tons of evidence that was available to them.

Again, You have people who say "how can you believe that conspiracy stuff?... it was proven in 9/11 commission report how that day went down" . I was simply stating that this shitty report dubunks no evidence in the 9/11 truth movement but it definately adds more fuel to the fire. That is what I meant by it debunks nothing.

Who is trying to mislead who? You are trying to mislead people by denying evidence, playing word games, simply typing "lol" and smilely faces as your response to undeniable evidence and picking and choosing which points to argue.
Last edited by Conan21; 05-03-2007 at 02:18 AM.


KuevDulin is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity