Thread: 9/11 questions
View Single Post
Old 05-03-2007, 02:58 AM   #8
saruxanset

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
471
Senior Member
Default

To Ommit,not Cover,not discuss, leav out,deny, what every words you want to use.... the existance of 47 Huge Interal Core columns and not indicate how they fell is mind boggling. If they wanted to make it atleast look atleast some what honest they could have stated that were there but were uncertain how the fell. The Also just completed OMMITTED building 7 from the report.
Originally Posted by Conan21 View Post
I will also say this again. It was not the intent of the 9/11 commission report scientifically address how the towers fell.

The report also didn't address the temperature that day. Is this significant? Does this indicate another cover up?

Here is the bottom line. On Sept. 11 2001 two aircraft traveling at speeds of greater than 500 mph hit the towers. The impact and the resulting inferno weakened the structure and caused them to collapse upon themselves floor by floor. This is how it happened. Science backs this up. To suggest otherwise is disrespectful to those who lost their lives on that day.

Take care and be well
saruxanset is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:43 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity