[artenotreah]

"The intent of the report was to provide the fullest possible account of the events the transpired on 9/11 and was compiled by a team of five democrats and five republicans."

They clearly did not provide the fullest possible account of the Events. They didn't even address all of the events that took place that day let alone the fullest account possilbe.

We can sit all here all day and argue back and forth about the science of how the buildings fell. Lets just say you are right. Planes alone brought them down. Scientifically proven. There is still a plathora of evidence that shows there was prior knowledge of the event. I haven't even addressed alot of points and I don't care to address anymore because I see how you are handling this debate and I don't think many people are reading this anyway.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Without sifting through this whole thread and pointing out every single issue that you did not address directly or indirectly; I'll just use the most recent one as an example.

I posted A video of Chief NIST engineer John Gross, who flat out denies the existence of molten steel at Ground Zero despite testimony on Film of ground zero workers talking about this Molten Steel Lava. Despite video footage and pictures of the firey sumbstance, and despite Nasa Thermal Imaging photos indicating exteme temperatures. He claims he was there and It didn't exist. I stated that Ground zero workers say some of these pools burned until December and then raised the question how did Jet Fuel cause this? or what caused this?

Link to the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR7_9QgAb-I

Your witty response to this Issue was this...

"Add John Gross and the Nist to the list of conspriators "