That's bullshit: because wikipedia makes mistakes, everything on wikipedia is false. You aren't attacking what Paikea is saying, you're not attacking Paikea's sources, you're not attacking where Paikea has found his information, but attacking the sources from a cut and paste. Maybe Paikea used his critic mind to test this article? Maybe he doesn't think that that is the definition of a theory because it is write on wikipedia, but because what is write on wikipedia is what he thinks? I was writing a post which was nearly the same as Paikea, I was reading the same article when he posted. That is what I was thinking: "I'm not good at clearly explaining things, has wikipedia something good? Yes it has! Whoou, that's exactly what I wanted to say, but well written! let's cut and paste it! obviously I'll put the source, i don't want to stole the works of other people".