[Crundaangerge]

Sorry Sparv it is NOT fact.

You are very hard with facts. I won't list the proofs. If you want, take a look at Al Gore's film (you can illegally download it if you don't want to buy it, or borrow it in a library). I don't like the film itself, nor Al Gore, but that's a good beginning.
Let's say that's a very well supported theory.

I'm calling this "fact" because it's far shorter than "very well supported theory". This kind of reflection about non-essential distinctions (because at one point or another, you have to think that very well supported theories are facts, or you don't do anything) was called "intellectual self-abuse" by one of my professor (who is a scientist in activity).

About my rude answer: I'm not drinking, I'm thinking in english, not my native language. I'm fed up with this type of argument, and it's late, BTW I go to bed.
You're right, it was way too agressive. I'm sorry and ashamed.

I don't even want real evidence for the supernatural being. I'm waiting for a supernatural being theory which is able to predict only one natural phenomenum. I'm still waiting.