DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**exettybele** · 07-04-2007, 09:05 AM

Is it me, or is that a bit silly? Why not just fix the limit at 3 above what it used to be, instead of saying the limit is the legal limit plus 3?

Has something to do with variances in speedometers and radar equipment, instead of having every second speeding fine challenged by people saying they were doing the limit, they just bump up the limit over which they will book you. If the limit is 65 they won't even bother unless you are doing over 68.

07-04-2007, 09:05 AM	#6
exettybele Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 404 Senior Member	Is it me, or is that a bit silly? Why not just fix the limit at 3 above what it used to be, instead of saying the limit is the legal limit plus 3? Has something to do with variances in speedometers and radar equipment, instead of having every second speeding fine challenged by people saying they were doing the limit, they just bump up the limit over which they will book you. If the limit is 65 they won't even bother unless you are doing over 68.
	Quote