DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**nvideoe** · 07-05-2007, 10:46 PM

Sorry - I call "Urban Legend".

See article in Sacramento Bee: http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/250678.html

I figured by now, someone else would have spoken up, but since no one else has . . .

Good catch.

I shall now go bash my co-worker over the noggin with her keyboard until she stops twitching, then, as a shamed I.T. Professional, I shall commit Seppuku by slicing myself open with an exposed IBM blade server, with my second shoving a tone generator in my ear and an RJ-45 connector in my left eye, and fiber op cable connected to our Clarion set on "extra crispy."
My sincerest apologies.

Actually, I am disappointed.
The only real law that I was hoping would go into effect was the "hands free" cell law. I can count at least 20 times in the last month where I was almost killed by a jackass not paying attention to the road talking on his cell phone while driving.

All is not lost it seems:
According to that website you provided:
"There is just enough truth in the list to make it believable. For instance, the Legislature did pass a law that drivers must use "hands-free" devices when talking on cell phones. But that law goes into effect a year from now, not today, as claimed in the bogus e-mail."

The worst part about it would be I would be killed because some retard could not find the self-discipline enough to drive for 20 minutes without calling up another jerk-ass who is also driving on his cell to say:
"So....whatchu doin?'
...Oh nothin....just drivin.....
yeah?....me too.....
You know what?
....what...
I think I really like Vanilla ice cream.
yeah........
.........
.........
.........
Um....Neopolitian is good too....
so what else you doin?
...nothin'
..whatchu doin?
.....
.........
..............Nothin'.....
(SCREEEEEEEE! WHAM!)

Yutzes.

07-05-2007, 10:46 PM	#12
nvideoe Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 489 Senior Member	Sorry - I call "Urban Legend". See article in Sacramento Bee: http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/250678.html I figured by now, someone else would have spoken up, but since no one else has . . . Good catch. I shall now go bash my co-worker over the noggin with her keyboard until she stops twitching, then, as a shamed I.T. Professional, I shall commit Seppuku by slicing myself open with an exposed IBM blade server, with my second shoving a tone generator in my ear and an RJ-45 connector in my left eye, and fiber op cable connected to our Clarion set on "extra crispy." My sincerest apologies. Actually, I am disappointed. The only real law that I was hoping would go into effect was the "hands free" cell law. I can count at least 20 times in the last month where I was almost killed by a jackass not paying attention to the road talking on his cell phone while driving. All is not lost it seems: According to that website you provided: "There is just enough truth in the list to make it believable. For instance, the Legislature did pass a law that drivers must use "hands-free" devices when talking on cell phones. But that law goes into effect a year from now, not today, as claimed in the bogus e-mail." The worst part about it would be I would be killed because some retard could not find the self-discipline enough to drive for 20 minutes without calling up another jerk-ass who is also driving on his cell to say: "So....whatchu doin?' ...Oh nothin....just drivin..... yeah?....me too..... You know what? ....what... I think I really like Vanilla ice cream. yeah........ ......... ......... ......... Um....Neopolitian is good too.... so what else you doin? ...nothin' ..whatchu doin? ..... ......... ..............Nothin'..... (SCREEEEEEEE! WHAM!) Yutzes.
	Quote