DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**cucceevevaind** · 10-04-2007, 06:51 AM

I remember when I was in school and my teacher wanted to use a rabit for dissection. of course I went against that idea and finally I won and the rabit didnt had to die (it should be dead by now anyway...).

the thing is that whats more ethically right, in one hand you have a frog for dissection in the other hand you have created a new different species (translucid frog). so whats better? kill the poor frog or invent a new animal that naturally doesnt exist??

personally I say none of it.

10-04-2007, 06:51 AM	#7
cucceevevaind Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 652 Senior Member	I remember when I was in school and my teacher wanted to use a rabit for dissection. of course I went against that idea and finally I won and the rabit didnt had to die (it should be dead by now anyway...). the thing is that whats more ethically right, in one hand you have a frog for dissection in the other hand you have created a new different species (translucid frog). so whats better? kill the poor frog or invent a new animal that naturally doesnt exist?? personally I say none of it.
	Quote