DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Dumpishchaism** · 08-07-2012, 04:21 PM

Here is Martin Rogers take on the controversial penalty. He doesn't seem to quite agree but mentions it is still up to the ref ....and to make this call in Live time is not easy.

http://sports.yahoo.com/video/contro...012500525.html

To think as the Canadians have said the USA bought the ref is silly.

Why would USA buy a ref against a team they have beaten 27 times in a row?

Much smarter to bribe the refs in the game against Japan....

Or just accept that one team wins and the other loses.

Personally I think Canada played the game of their lives and deserved a better fate.

08-07-2012, 04:21 PM	#5
Dumpishchaism Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 485 Senior Member	Here is Martin Rogers take on the controversial penalty. He doesn't seem to quite agree but mentions it is still up to the ref ....and to make this call in Live time is not easy. http://sports.yahoo.com/video/contro...012500525.html To think as the Canadians have said the USA bought the ref is silly. Why would USA buy a ref against a team they have beaten 27 times in a row? Much smarter to bribe the refs in the game against Japan.... Or just accept that one team wins and the other loses. Personally I think Canada played the game of their lives and deserved a better fate.
	Quote