DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Poll: Voters Would Rather Tax The Wealthy Than Cut Social Security

**Teareerah** · 11-15-2010, 06:07 AM

No, Paul, you don't get off that easily. Any time anyone you disagree with doesn't state their position with absolute precision, you are completely incapable of interpreting anything that is implicit in their statement, and spend multiple posts arguing about how that person either flip-flopped, can't express him/herself well, or outright lied.

So, now it's your turn. Are you changing your position, or are you simply incapable of stating what you mean the first time?

But at least you've manned up and admitted that you have no concrete evidence for your first statement.

Never said I had evidence, I said "likely" which implies probably, so I said More Dems are probably in favor of cutting social security than (Conservatives). As a said this was an aside. Of course you took the statement to mean that I believe "most" Dems favor Social Security cuts. That is a conclusion that only someone severely challanged in reading comprehension and logic would make. Not suprising from you, of course. DES a little more so.
That said that statement is not really relevant it was just an aside and was actually my 3rd statement. The first being:
Wow, talk about presenting false choices. and the second being: Really, I didn't know that cutting Social Security was a key part of the Conservative economic Agenda. When you asked me to give evidence to back up my statement I naturally assumed you meant my second as it didn't occur to me that anyone would be stupid enough to ask for evidence backing up a statement beginning with "It is likely" a phrase which indicates a degree of uncertainity. But apparently you fall into that category.

So what is that, at least three times, you have failed massively in drawing conclusions from the wriitten word in this thread alone? A really pathetic display by you.

BTW -- Have you asked any five-year-olds to explain the fallacy in your logical conclusions to the poll question Richard posted? Please.

11-15-2010, 06:07 AM	#31
Teareerah Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 440 Senior Member	No, Paul, you don't get off that easily. Any time anyone you disagree with doesn't state their position with absolute precision, you are completely incapable of interpreting anything that is implicit in their statement, and spend multiple posts arguing about how that person either flip-flopped, can't express him/herself well, or outright lied. So, now it's your turn. Are you changing your position, or are you simply incapable of stating what you mean the first time? But at least you've manned up and admitted that you have no concrete evidence for your first statement. Never said I had evidence, I said "likely" which implies probably, so I said More Dems are probably in favor of cutting social security than (Conservatives). As a said this was an aside. Of course you took the statement to mean that I believe "most" Dems favor Social Security cuts. That is a conclusion that only someone severely challanged in reading comprehension and logic would make. Not suprising from you, of course. DES a little more so. That said that statement is not really relevant it was just an aside and was actually my 3rd statement. The first being: Wow, talk about presenting false choices. and the second being: Really, I didn't know that cutting Social Security was a key part of the Conservative economic Agenda. When you asked me to give evidence to back up my statement I naturally assumed you meant my second as it didn't occur to me that anyone would be stupid enough to ask for evidence backing up a statement beginning with "It is likely" a phrase which indicates a degree of uncertainity. But apparently you fall into that category. So what is that, at least three times, you have failed massively in drawing conclusions from the wriitten word in this thread alone? A really pathetic display by you. BTW -- Have you asked any five-year-olds to explain the fallacy in your logical conclusions to the poll question Richard posted? Please.
	Quote