[funnyPasds]

Reproduction has nothing to do with the issues facing homosexuality or gay marriage. Should a straigh couple that weds and doesn't want children have their union nullified? Apparently, the way I interperet your post Paul, it should, as this is obviously a defective reproductive practice.

What about a hetero couple that can't have children, but want to? This is literally defective. Should they be forced to separate? Again, by your words, I can only presume that's your stance.

You've defined marriage by a religious view Paul, that's not supposed to be legal in this country. It imposes on other beliefs, and without any reason other than your own belief. Further, you've just alienated all these loving, hetero couples I just mentioned above.

My original post, the one you can't understand, was about one of the wrong decisions our Supreme Court made. Or do you agree that slaves were rightful property, and not people of their own free will? I was refering to court decisions that take away people's inalienable rights as humans, and it has nothing to do with reproduction. If they are so inclined, they can adopt, as other hetero couples choose to do instead of procreating on their own. But again, you'd apparently want to nullify their marriages too.