View Single Post
Old 06-22-2010, 06:20 PM   #12
RobertLS

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
Then find a current study not one that uses data from two to three + decades ago, that only divides income into above and below the medium income levels (doesn't segregate poor as was my original claim) and even at that doesn't have income data from almost 15% of the respondents and admits doesn't control for many variables that effect cigarette consumption.

Like I said I said demonstrate not say. That particular study does not demonstrate even though it says it does.

BTW -- back in the day, in the years the study encompasses being below the median in income did not mean you did not pay Federal income taxes.
Sorry, not doing your research for you. You're the one who made the claim that none of the studies in Pinky's links met certain criteria. Pinky posted at 5:25pm. You responded at 5:48pm. In 23 minutes, you were able to review the multitude of studies cited in the links she provided in order to make the general statement that you made? Call me crazy, but somehow I doubt that.

As for the Incident Semantics Game, thanks but I'll sit this round out.
RobertLS is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity