Thread
:
Are Dienekes' opinions any good ?
View Single Post
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM
#
29
YpciJQdo
Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
395
Senior Member
As I already stated often before, I don't know much about genetics and ancient migrations. But Maciamo's theories sound very understandable and reasonable to me, where theories of other people (also Dienekes) often lack explanations. His theories sometimes miss some details, which he admits due to missing data. But he presents possibilities with ranked probabilities (without ridiculing the lower-chance possibilities), so I enjoy reading in the Genetics Forum.
The Neanderthal-Theories are really an exception for me. I find Maciamo's theories really interesting and don't want to deny the possibility of accelerated cultural evolution due to Neanderthal-admixture. But IMO it is still VERY hypothetical, but it's presentation seems a bit too certain.
Yet I get angry each time I read the name Dienekes, as he made me look like a jerk infront of the whole Eupedia-Forum
http://www.eupedia.com/forum/showthr...ric-Calculator
)
Quote
YpciJQdo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by YpciJQdo
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
03:21 AM
.