View Single Post
Old 09-01-2012, 12:48 PM   #29
YpciJQdo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
395
Senior Member
Default
As I already stated often before, I don't know much about genetics and ancient migrations. But Maciamo's theories sound very understandable and reasonable to me, where theories of other people (also Dienekes) often lack explanations. His theories sometimes miss some details, which he admits due to missing data. But he presents possibilities with ranked probabilities (without ridiculing the lower-chance possibilities), so I enjoy reading in the Genetics Forum.

The Neanderthal-Theories are really an exception for me. I find Maciamo's theories really interesting and don't want to deny the possibility of accelerated cultural evolution due to Neanderthal-admixture. But IMO it is still VERY hypothetical, but it's presentation seems a bit too certain.

Yet I get angry each time I read the name Dienekes, as he made me look like a jerk infront of the whole Eupedia-Forumhttp://www.eupedia.com/forum/showthr...ric-Calculator)
YpciJQdo is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:21 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity