View Single Post
Old 12-06-2011, 05:24 AM   #2
JackTimQSR

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
582
Senior Member
Default
http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/new..._in_combat.htm

More than 200,000 women have served in the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, and over 100 have died in Iraq alone. But frontline combat duty, with its risks and rewards, is not officially an option for American women serving in the military. A group of University of Virginia School of Law students, a professor and a graduate want to change that and are aiming to seek out litigants to win women the official right to serve in combat roles — and to qualify for the draft as well.

"Our goals are to gain official recognition for those women who have been placed in harm's way in the course of line of duty, and to expose a gender classification that is based on archaic stereotypes and is unconstitutional," said second-year law student Kyle Mallinak. "We don't just have to speculate about how women would perform in combat conditions. We know now that they've performed, and performed well."


I really don't like the idea of this. Let the services decide when it should happen.
The services don't change or make laws...they follow them. Active duty personnel are rarely in a position to challenge laws.

I think if women can meet the same standards already in place in infantry or combat MOSs - let them. But don't FORCE the issue. In some article about this they stated that our "constitutional rights" were being violated. How? It's not a "right" to serve. So I don't know where they got that. It is a right to not be arbitrarily discriminated against. This argument that "there is no right to serve" is completely flawed. There is no right to work at Dominoes...is Dominoes there free to discriminate against blacks, women and jews? There is no right to live at 193 Elm St....is the seller of 193 Elm St. therefore free to refuse to sell to Christians? Etc., etc.

The law keeping women from having to sign up for the draft will go away if women are allowed in infantry. That's the only reason we aren't required to sign up for the draft. Because that's to fill up infantry basically. Yes, and it should go away.

I think that combat MOSs should be open for those women who can MEET the same standards but not force any who don't want to do it. I mean all males don't have to be infantry. I think women should have to sign up for Selective Service too. Are you saying that this would force women into the infantry when men are not? What is your point. You seem to agree with the goal of the Law School Team (to open up combat to women), but are trying hard to disagree with them.

But I really don't like people outside the military getting involved with these things. And there is no "right" to serve. I think things are a lot better for females today than 10, 15, 20 years ago and on in the past. It's not perfect but it never will be. It wasn't the "services" that up and decided to allow women...
JackTimQSR is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity