View Single Post
Old 12-07-2011, 08:44 PM   #16
Quiniacab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
I don't like the idea of these law students doing it - when they have no military experience and they state "constitutional right" as their basis. THAT is what gets me.
They would have to have clients before they actually file a suit, of course. One of the lawyers has military experience, and I believe is still in the Guard or Reserve, if that makes you feel better.

Did I say they should get preferential treatment when choosing a job? Where did I say that because now I'm confused? All I see in my comment you replied to is that they should open combat MOSs to women. I didn't say that women would flock to them. Just that those would be another option IF they qualify. Aso if someone gets a 16 on their ASVAB - male or female - I don't think they're getting in. They are returning to standards again with all the budget cuts and having to get rid of people. I guess I should've clarified more of "I don't like the idea of this." That was a bit vague. No we shouldn't get preferential treatment on choosing a job but we don't get preferential treatment on choosing a job now anyway. I'm confused...you say that combat MOSs should be open to women. Then, you say you "don't like the idea of this."

It is my understanding that "this" is opening combat MOSs to women...

So, it seems to me you are saying "Combat MOSs should be open to women, but I don't like the idea of opening combat MOSs to women."
Quiniacab is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity