View Single Post
Old 12-08-2011, 02:59 AM   #25
xquFzpNw

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
Yes, every thinks women should have to meet the same standards if they are to serve in combat MOSs.

Now, as to whether or not lawyers should seek out clients to challenge laws...well, I think that's exactly what they should be doing. I don't buy the whole "you mut be in the military to have an opinion on who gets to be in the military."

And as mentioned, at least one lawyer has prior service and is currently in the Reserve or Guard...is that okay now?
That's not what I meant. Okay I botched this up but I thought I explained it. I don't like them saying they're doing this because it's a "constitutional right." It's not a "constitutional right" to serve in the military. THAT is my big deal with their approach. Does that make sense now?
xquFzpNw is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:38 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity