DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - 'Occupy Wall Street' Protesters to Be Forced Out of New York Park During Cleaning

**Frdsdx26** · 10-14-2011, 05:50 PM

I'm curious as to what's funding this movement, hard to analyze to the gnat's ass detail but I think we can safely say that this whole thing can't be happening for free. Anyone else have any thoughts?

Well, the speculation and signature of this type of protest that has happened before says George Soros. There are many of his foundations supporting it.

Funny thing is some liberals that claim this is like the TEA party, but yet there was never a protest that lasted 4 weeks with catered food of salmon and other buffets behind it. Nor did any of the TEA partiers get paid for protesting as there have been reports of OWS people being paid.

Here is the Ruiters link.

I agree. This is starting to sound more and more like another Tea Party.

Honestly - let's think about this:

-They're angry.
-Don't have any particular direction or goals
-Lots of publicity
-Oppose the bailout to the banks

This is EXACTLY how the Tea Party started out. Now the Tea Party is pro-bank, and whores itself to the Corporations. Useful idiots. The more I look at this Wall Street protest, the more I think this will turn out the same way.

As to counter ignorant Joes assertion that the TEA party was ever disorganized with no direction, it has always been about getting control of the out of control government spending outside the constitution while driving up the debt at the expense of putting our grandkids in debt before they are even born. The goals of the TEA party was clear, they were disgruntled, they had publicity because is bucked the system and was being called violent and racist (that it never was), and opposed the bailouts blaming them on over inflated government, not calling for a suspension of the constitution as these people and their supporters have done.

Actually, OWS is upset that those bailouts went to fund bonuses of millionares and CEOs. The TEA party was against the bailouts all together.

10-14-2011, 05:50 PM	#26
Frdsdx26 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 467 Senior Member	I'm curious as to what's funding this movement, hard to analyze to the gnat's ass detail but I think we can safely say that this whole thing can't be happening for free. Anyone else have any thoughts? Well, the speculation and signature of this type of protest that has happened before says George Soros. There are many of his foundations supporting it. Funny thing is some liberals that claim this is like the TEA party, but yet there was never a protest that lasted 4 weeks with catered food of salmon and other buffets behind it. Nor did any of the TEA partiers get paid for protesting as there have been reports of OWS people being paid. Here is the Ruiters link. I agree. This is starting to sound more and more like another Tea Party. Honestly - let's think about this: -They're angry. -Don't have any particular direction or goals -Lots of publicity -Oppose the bailout to the banks This is EXACTLY how the Tea Party started out. Now the Tea Party is pro-bank, and whores itself to the Corporations. Useful idiots. The more I look at this Wall Street protest, the more I think this will turn out the same way. As to counter ignorant Joes assertion that the TEA party was ever disorganized with no direction, it has always been about getting control of the out of control government spending outside the constitution while driving up the debt at the expense of putting our grandkids in debt before they are even born. The goals of the TEA party was clear, they were disgruntled, they had publicity because is bucked the system and was being called violent and racist (that it never was), and opposed the bailouts blaming them on over inflated government, not calling for a suspension of the constitution as these people and their supporters have done. Actually, OWS is upset that those bailouts went to fund bonuses of millionares and CEOs. The TEA party was against the bailouts all together.
	Quote