DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**hellenmoranov** · 08-26-2012, 04:24 AM

Rizzo's dilemma cannot be resolved without knowing the state in which this voter's ballot will be cast. Only about one-third of the states are seriously in contention. If you live in Texas, the District of Columbia, California or Wyoming, you may as well not bother to vote because we already know which candidate will carry each of those states.

Fuck that. Not voting manages to pull off both stupid and lazy. Even if your state isn't going to swing your way it's still another voice in support of your candidate to say nothing of the local elections that take place at the same time.

08-26-2012, 04:24 AM	#32
hellenmoranov Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 367 Senior Member	Rizzo's dilemma cannot be resolved without knowing the state in which this voter's ballot will be cast. Only about one-third of the states are seriously in contention. If you live in Texas, the District of Columbia, California or Wyoming, you may as well not bother to vote because we already know which candidate will carry each of those states. Fuck that. Not voting manages to pull off both stupid and lazy. Even if your state isn't going to swing your way it's still another voice in support of your candidate to say nothing of the local elections that take place at the same time.
	Quote