DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**usadatronourl** · 04-28-2008, 12:05 PM

i would think with higher aperture size still most of the image would be sharp (at least a wider range)? with lower aperture like 2.8 wouldn't it be more blurry ? (again i am no expert on photography but just was thinking about some settings i use) when i want to take a close up macro shot and want the background to be as blurry as i can get, i usually set my aperture size to say f/2.8 and set a as high shutter speed as i can (or should maybe say shortest exposure time depending on the light).... ....

ok i am confused by all the things i wrote [rofl]

[rofl]

man go on ebay buy an old camera and some films which passed their expiry date :-) [rofl]

04-28-2008, 12:05 PM	#7
usadatronourl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 394 Senior Member	i would think with higher aperture size still most of the image would be sharp (at least a wider range)? with lower aperture like 2.8 wouldn't it be more blurry ? (again i am no expert on photography but just was thinking about some settings i use) when i want to take a close up macro shot and want the background to be as blurry as i can get, i usually set my aperture size to say f/2.8 and set a as high shutter speed as i can (or should maybe say shortest exposure time depending on the light).... .... ok i am confused by all the things i wrote [rofl][rofl] man go on ebay buy an old camera and some films which passed their expiry date :-) [rofl]
	Quote