DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Reggie Clemons

**GECEDEANY** · 08-22-2012, 09:43 PM

Yeah, so f-ing what. But like RainWind said, it's the principle.

--- Post Update ---

Woah, woah, WOAH!

I only bother to look at multiple sources for anything important. I will always rely on The Sun for Halle Berry's bra size information.

I think you'll find that when it comes to the news, Guardian readers will agree with Guardian readers, Daily Fail readers will agree with Daily Fail readers etc etc. Newspapers are just a commercialised version of politics in my opinion so the views of the readers are always polarised and argued to the death.

That being said...infowars. Come on man, you can do a bit better than that, can't you?

Maybe it's because I talk bollocks, but if i say something and someone asks for a source, there is no source i could possibly give that would be then accpeted credible. That was kind of my point. So to avoid this you'd reel of as many sources as possible when asked for them, but maybe most importantly dont post **** that will make peole ask for sources.

Ok, infowars.... I find Alex Jones entertaining. Whether that's all it is or not I hardly care. I look at the website and I see articles of news, allmost exclusively anti NWO stuff at the moment I suppose, but at least the articles are based on actual events and facts. Even though they are often expanded upon to a degree. I don't know why I defend it though really, we can all make our own minds up.

08-22-2012, 09:43 PM	#35
GECEDEANY Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 480 Senior Member	Yeah, so f-ing what. But like RainWind said, it's the principle. --- Post Update --- Woah, woah, WOAH! I only bother to look at multiple sources for anything important. I will always rely on The Sun for Halle Berry's bra size information. I think you'll find that when it comes to the news, Guardian readers will agree with Guardian readers, Daily Fail readers will agree with Daily Fail readers etc etc. Newspapers are just a commercialised version of politics in my opinion so the views of the readers are always polarised and argued to the death. That being said...infowars. Come on man, you can do a bit better than that, can't you? Maybe it's because I talk bollocks, but if i say something and someone asks for a source, there is no source i could possibly give that would be then accpeted credible. That was kind of my point. So to avoid this you'd reel of as many sources as possible when asked for them, but maybe most importantly dont post **** that will make peole ask for sources. Ok, infowars.... I find Alex Jones entertaining. Whether that's all it is or not I hardly care. I look at the website and I see articles of news, allmost exclusively anti NWO stuff at the moment I suppose, but at least the articles are based on actual events and facts. Even though they are often expanded upon to a degree. I don't know why I defend it though really, we can all make our own minds up.
	Quote