DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**domeffire** · 07-21-2012, 02:56 AM

I'd rather a shooter be caught alive and go through that. Trial and prison time is a worse sentence IMO. I can't imagine he will have a pleasant stay. The article said he may have shot up some children too. He probably won't last long in prison.

Why would people want to pay to keep this guy alive in Prison. Just execute him and be done with it. I'm all for the Death Sentence, especially in clear cut cases like this.

For ambiguous cases by all means determine if there was a murder and if it was pre-meditated, temporary insanity, or just accidental homocide such as a car accident.

But if a man walks into a theater and just starts shooting people up and there is 100% proof, don't waste the peoples money and time. Or draw it out the suffering of victims and families. Pull his plug and be done with it.

07-21-2012, 02:56 AM	#37
domeffire Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 516 Senior Member	I'd rather a shooter be caught alive and go through that. Trial and prison time is a worse sentence IMO. I can't imagine he will have a pleasant stay. The article said he may have shot up some children too. He probably won't last long in prison. Why would people want to pay to keep this guy alive in Prison. Just execute him and be done with it. I'm all for the Death Sentence, especially in clear cut cases like this. For ambiguous cases by all means determine if there was a murder and if it was pre-meditated, temporary insanity, or just accidental homocide such as a car accident. But if a man walks into a theater and just starts shooting people up and there is 100% proof, don't waste the peoples money and time. Or draw it out the suffering of victims and families. Pull his plug and be done with it.
	Quote