DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Another reason Obamacare is Unconstutional.

**Stasher11** · 08-16-2012, 03:24 AM

If accurate.. And I wasn't aware of this.. Were you?

ObamaCare fundamentally changes the relationship between the executive and legislative branches of government. The law creates a 15 member “Independent Payment Advisory Board” which is vested with the unilateral power to make and enforce laws, including rationing of health care and imposition of new taxes. As reported by a Cato Policy Analysis, under ObamaCare, the IPAB proposals will have the force of law without the approval of Congress or the signature of the President. Congress may only block its edicts if the House and Senate pass, and the President signs, an alternative that achieves the same budgetary result. After 2020, the law requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement IPAB’s “proposals” even if Congress enacts a substitute. Finally, the law gives IPAB and the Secretary “the sole authority to judge their own actions by prohibiting administrative or judicial review of the Secretary’s implementation of an IPAB proposal.”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/charlesk...of-government/ I don't believe Congress has the power to delegate their authority in this manner..

???

08-16-2012, 03:24 AM	#1
Stasher11 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 505 Senior Member	Another reason Obamacare is Unconstutional. If accurate.. And I wasn't aware of this.. Were you? ObamaCare fundamentally changes the relationship between the executive and legislative branches of government. The law creates a 15 member “Independent Payment Advisory Board” which is vested with the unilateral power to make and enforce laws, including rationing of health care and imposition of new taxes. As reported by a Cato Policy Analysis, under ObamaCare, the IPAB proposals will have the force of law without the approval of Congress or the signature of the President. Congress may only block its edicts if the House and Senate pass, and the President signs, an alternative that achieves the same budgetary result. After 2020, the law requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement IPAB’s “proposals” even if Congress enacts a substitute. Finally, the law gives IPAB and the Secretary “the sole authority to judge their own actions by prohibiting administrative or judicial review of the Secretary’s implementation of an IPAB proposal.” http://www.forbes.com/sites/charlesk...of-government/ I don't believe Congress has the power to delegate their authority in this manner.. ???
	Quote