DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**zabiqapara** · 08-03-2012, 04:26 PM

No, it's more about increasing expenses and diverting revenue from suburbs to urban areas than, like, an outright abolition..

Like stealth taxing them, in an effort to make them less attractive.

He may be fucking himself. The more affluent members of society tend to live further afield than the inner cities. That's a hell of a lot of votes and influence. We're talking about alienating the very people he works alongside, after all. Not only them, but their families and friends. I'd wager there isn't a single member of Congress who doesn't live in suburbia.

08-03-2012, 04:26 PM	#7
zabiqapara Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 503 Senior Member	No, it's more about increasing expenses and diverting revenue from suburbs to urban areas than, like, an outright abolition.. Like stealth taxing them, in an effort to make them less attractive. He may be fucking himself. The more affluent members of society tend to live further afield than the inner cities. That's a hell of a lot of votes and influence. We're talking about alienating the very people he works alongside, after all. Not only them, but their families and friends. I'd wager there isn't a single member of Congress who doesn't live in suburbia.
	Quote