DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Dems Try To Slip Gun Control Into Cybersecurity Bill

**weaddercaps** · 07-27-2012, 08:31 PM

The amendment was sponsored by Democratic Sens. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.), Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Jack Reed (R.I.), Bob Menendez (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Schumer and Dianne Feinstein (Calif.). S.A. 2575 would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition with the exception of .22 caliber rim fire ammunition.

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure

Follow that link and take a look at the smirking face.

How come police and military are exempt from these gun control measures?
Why is it always just aimed at just The People.

Well...well...lookie here...
I just found this over at the Chiefs of Police website:

http://www.theiacp.org/Portals/0/pdfs/DOTH-Critical-Issues.pdf

Page 4 under the heading, REDUCE FIREARMS VIOLENCE AND TARGET ILLEGAL GUNS

ACTION STEPS:
Support S. 32, the Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act, introduced by Sen.
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ).

There's a troubling list of gun control initiatives posted there.
Now why would the Chiefs of Police want to limit the public's ability to defend themselves equal to the police?
Shouldn't the police live by the same rules we do?
Is some group of government employees working towards a monopoly of force in the hands of government?

07-27-2012, 08:31 PM	#1
weaddercaps Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 594 Senior Member	Dems Try To Slip Gun Control Into Cybersecurity Bill The amendment was sponsored by Democratic Sens. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.), Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Jack Reed (R.I.), Bob Menendez (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Schumer and Dianne Feinstein (Calif.). S.A. 2575 would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition with the exception of .22 caliber rim fire ammunition. http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure Follow that link and take a look at the smirking face. How come police and military are exempt from these gun control measures? Why is it always just aimed at just The People. Well...well...lookie here... I just found this over at the Chiefs of Police website: http://www.theiacp.org/Portals/0/pdfs/DOTH-Critical-Issues.pdf Page 4 under the heading, *REDUCE FIREARMS VIOLENCE AND TARGET ILLEGAL GUNS* ACTION STEPS: Support S. 32, the Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act, introduced by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ). There's a troubling list of gun control initiatives posted there. Now why would the Chiefs of Police want to limit the public's ability to defend themselves equal to the police? Shouldn't the police live by the same rules we do? Is some group of government employees working towards a monopoly of force in the hands of government?
	Quote