DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**lzwha** · 06-28-2012, 10:46 PM

Because I'm wondering who else noticed that Mitt didn't call Obamacare UNCONSTITUTIONAL..

You see, the precedent is key here.. The idea that the government can't force you to buy things.

He didn't say that..

He didn't say that because SCOTUS didn't say that. It's unconstitutional to most thinking people, but to libtards, other socialists and politicians, they don't care if it's constitutional. They care about grabbing more power. When the high court allows that it's a good day for big government and politicians. Mitt is a big politician and wants power, in that way he is no different. How he will get and use that power is the difference.

06-28-2012, 10:46 PM	#6
lzwha Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 398 Senior Member	Because I'm wondering who else noticed that Mitt didn't call Obamacare UNCONSTITUTIONAL.. You see, the precedent is key here.. The idea that the government can't force you to buy things. He didn't say that.. He didn't say that because SCOTUS didn't say that. It's unconstitutional to most thinking people, but to libtards, other socialists and politicians, they don't care if it's constitutional. They care about grabbing more power. When the high court allows that it's a good day for big government and politicians. Mitt is a big politician and wants power, in that way he is no different. How he will get and use that power is the difference.
	Quote