DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**CaseyFronczekHomie** · 06-28-2012, 11:50 PM

Then he falls right in line with the SC.

Whats to be gained by him spouting "unconstitutional" in the face of a SC ruling saying its not?

It's not constitutional for the government to force people to buy shit it thinks they "need"

06-28-2012, 11:50 PM	#19
CaseyFronczekHomie Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 398 Senior Member	Then he falls right in line with the SC. Whats to be gained by him spouting "unconstitutional" in the face of a SC ruling saying its not? It's not constitutional for the government to force people to buy shit it thinks they "need"
	Quote