[robinthesearchmasterh]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project...erican_Century

9/11 served as the pretext along with all the lies about "yellow cake" and WMDs that took us into Iraq.

On September 20, 2001 (nine days after the September 11, 2001 attacks), the PNAC sent a letter to President George W. Bush, advocating "a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq," or regime change:

...even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism. The Israelis want all of Palestine and they want to remove all the non Jews from it in order to preserve their "Jewish identity". The Palestinians don't like gradually being kicked out and living in a giant concentration camp, so they throw rocks at Israelis and launch small and mostly ineffective rockets at them. These rockets occasionally kill someone. Also on occasion some hopelessly desperate and angry Iraqi or Arab is persuaded to blow himself up for the cause and possibly so his family will be awarded few dollars.

The Israelis don't like this resistance so they need the whole area surrounding them neutralized in order to ensure themselves Lebensraum.



According to critics, including Paul Reynolds, PNAC promoted American "hegemony" and "full-spectrum" dominance in its publications. Ebrahim Afsah, in "Creed, Cabal, or Conspiracy – The Origins of the Current Neo-Conservative Revolution in US Strategic Thinking", published in the German Law Journal, cited Jochen Bölsche's view that the goal of the PNAC was world dominance or global hegemony by the United States.
George Monbiot, a political activist from the United Kingdom, stated: "...to pretend that this battle begins and ends in Iraq requires a willful denial of the context in which it occurs. That context is a blunt attempt by the superpower to reshape the world to suit itself."[36]

PNAC co-founder Robert Kagan countered such criticism in his statement during a debate on whether or not "The United States Is, and Should Be, an Empire": "There is a vital distinction between being powerful--even most powerful in the world--and being an empire. Economic expansion does not equal imperialism, and there is no such thing as "cultural imperialism". If America is an empire, then why was it unable to mobilize its subjects to support the war against Saddam Hussein? America is not an empire, and its power stems from voluntary associations and alliances. American hegemony is relatively well accepted because people all over the world know that U.S. forces will eventually withdraw from the occupied territories. The effect of declaring that the United States is an empire would not only be factually wrong, but strategically catastrophic. Contrary to the exploitative purposes of the British, the American intentions of spreading democracy and individual rights are incompatible with the notion of an empire. The genius of American power is expressed in the movie The Godfather II, where, like Hyman Roth, the United States has always made money for its partners. America has not turned countries in which it intervened into deserts; it enriched them. Even the Russians knew they could surrender after the Cold War without being subjected to occupation." Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" This was written before 9/11.

PNAC has since been disbanded, if in name only because there is a new committee or whatever it's called which is little more than a continuation of the old. The name change leaves the impression that this is a thing of the past.

The Jews behind all of this, being the advertising specialist they they are, know the value of assigning the right labels and choosing the right words to call things in order to sell the public anything. Americans, busy with their personal lives don't have the time to investigate every move these people make nor can they depend on an unbiased news media to give them the information they need to evaluate it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_jRT...eature=related