DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Kvkcgktl** · 12-31-2011, 01:55 AM

Most 'debates' between Genesis Creation and Darwinism are inherently skewed. They are commonly portrayed as "Religion versus Science". This is a canard.

In actual fact, Genesis-versus-Darwin is NOT Religion-versus-Science. ... Rather, it is Religion-versus-Religion! Strawman. Questionable premise.

This is a very important distinction for the thinking person to make. Without such an understanding, the Darwinist is much more likely to fall for pseudo-scientific theories and fraudulent science. This is why Darwinists tend to be more gullible and naive people, and tend to have a great aversion for critical thinking. Ad hominem.

So, the Scientific question then becomes ... If Genesis and Darwinism are each ultimately a matter of faith, which account is supported by the observable data? Questionable premise.

Let me give just one observation here: overlapping Dinosaur and Bi-pedal Human footprints.

In several places around the world, there are petrified mud beds where BOTH Reptilian Dinosaurs AND Bi-pedal Humans have left their footprints together. In fact, in the case of two, the Human footprint is actually INSIDE the Dinosaur footprint!

... Amazing?

According to the Darwinist faith, the Reptilian Dinosaurs went extinct some 63 million years ago. However, upright bi-pedal man did not appear until some 3 million years ago. ... Hmmmm.

Therefore, a very pointed question to the Darwinist is in order here: ... How did imprinted footprints of wet mud span a gap of 60 million years, untouched and without petrification? Cum hoc ergo propter hoc. Suppressed/overlooked evidence. False dilemma.

To that they are speechless. Blatant lie.

Of course, the Genesis account has no problem with Man walking side-by-side with Dinosaurs as the ACTUAL OBSERVABLE and VERIFIABLE petroglyphs show. False dilemma.

So, back to our original question: ... If Genesis and Darwinism are each ultimately a matter of faith, which account is supported by the observable data? Questionable premise.

Clearly, Genesis is supported by the observable data, and Darwinism is refuted by the observable data. This is for all to see. Suppressed/overlooked evidence.

... Do you still believe in the Religion of Darwinism? Ad hominem.

Faith in Jesus Christ is much more powerful than man's tired old fables and lies. Non-sequitur.

12-31-2011, 01:55 AM	#2
Kvkcgktl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 339 Senior Member	Most 'debates' between Genesis Creation and Darwinism are inherently skewed. They are commonly portrayed as "Religion versus Science". This is a canard. In actual fact, Genesis-versus-Darwin is NOT Religion-versus-Science. ... Rather, it is Religion-versus-Religion! Strawman. Questionable premise. This is a very important distinction for the thinking person to make. Without such an understanding, the Darwinist is much more likely to fall for pseudo-scientific theories and fraudulent science. This is why Darwinists tend to be more gullible and naive people, and tend to have a great aversion for critical thinking. Ad hominem. So, the Scientific question then becomes ... If Genesis and Darwinism are each ultimately a matter of faith, which account is supported by the observable data? Questionable premise. Let me give just one observation here: overlapping Dinosaur and Bi-pedal Human footprints. In several places around the world, there are petrified mud beds where BOTH Reptilian Dinosaurs AND Bi-pedal Humans have left their footprints together. In fact, in the case of two, the Human footprint is actually INSIDE the Dinosaur footprint! ... Amazing? According to the Darwinist faith, the Reptilian Dinosaurs went extinct some 63 million years ago. However, upright bi-pedal man did not appear until some 3 million years ago. ... Hmmmm. Therefore, a very pointed question to the Darwinist is in order here: ... How did imprinted footprints of wet mud span a gap of 60 million years, untouched and without petrification? Cum hoc ergo propter hoc. Suppressed/overlooked evidence. False dilemma. To that they are speechless. Blatant lie. Of course, the Genesis account has no problem with Man walking side-by-side with Dinosaurs as the ACTUAL OBSERVABLE and VERIFIABLE petroglyphs show. False dilemma. So, back to our original question: ... If Genesis and Darwinism are each ultimately a matter of faith, which account is supported by the observable data? Questionable premise. Clearly, Genesis is supported by the observable data, and Darwinism is refuted by the observable data. This is for all to see. Suppressed/overlooked evidence. ... Do you still believe in the Religion of Darwinism? Ad hominem. Faith in Jesus Christ is much more powerful than man's tired old fables and lies. Non-sequitur.
	Quote