DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Chooriwrocafn** · 12-31-2011, 03:14 AM

1. Science is not religion. Stephen J. Gould eloquently argued that they are non-overlapping magisteria and many scientists practice a religion and do not find that it conflicts with their scientific work; only creationists seem to feel threatened by science.
2. Your use of the term Darwinism immediately brands you as a creationist shill. If you want to discuss science, use appropriate terms. Darwin died a long time ago, and although scientists respect his ground-breaking work, evolutionary theory has progressed a great deal since his time.
3. Neither Answers in Genesis nor a tv show are accurate sources of scientific information.
4. You are free to believe whatever religion you want, but if you try to use that religion to discredit science without providing credible evidence, expect to be vociferously challenged here.

12-31-2011, 03:14 AM	#16
Chooriwrocafn Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 457 Senior Member	1. Science is not religion. Stephen J. Gould eloquently argued that they are non-overlapping magisteria and many scientists practice a religion and do not find that it conflicts with their scientific work; only creationists seem to feel threatened by science. 2. Your use of the term Darwinism immediately brands you as a creationist shill. If you want to discuss science, use appropriate terms. Darwin died a long time ago, and although scientists respect his ground-breaking work, evolutionary theory has progressed a great deal since his time. 3. Neither Answers in Genesis nor a tv show are accurate sources of scientific information. 4. You are free to believe whatever religion you want, but if you try to use that religion to discredit science without providing credible evidence, expect to be vociferously challenged here.
	Quote