View Single Post
Old 09-03-2012, 11:21 PM   #26
TheDoctor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
488
Senior Member
Default
think about the consequences of such a statement...

if the rahma of Allah were conditional on being mediated through a "shaykh"

then those without access to a shaykh would be denied the rahma of Allah.

which means that that the Raham of Allah is confined and limited.

that last bit of the syllogism is clearly false, hence you don't need a shaykh to benefit from Allah's grace.

The rahma of Allah is universal, unlimited and open to all.

the beauty of Islam is that our deen liberates us from priestly beaurocracy of mystics, fakirs and middle-men.

through your salat, dhikr and piety you can be a direct beneficiary of Allah's love.

you don't need a shaykh.


Again your post is stuck on the same aspect.. please get on with it.

If as you say Allah's rahma is not to be confines (which we have not said) then in such manney you should stop eating food as Allah's sustinance is not to be confined in food as well..

TheDoctor is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:58 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity