View Single Post
Old 09-04-2012, 12:21 AM   #22
kertionderf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
Hardcore ikwani muslimeen thought they formed a revolutionary 'vanguard' (socialist and modernist influences) against a jahili society which was kafir. They were isolationist takfiris. Had they not adopted these modernist assumptions, actually setup a baitul mal and collected zakaat they would have had more success.

People can rebel against the nation-state in non violent ways, not paying taxes, hiding ones true income from the state, exploiting the inefficient bureaucracy by losing paperwork, delaying tactics...doing everything to help the state ruin itself. And all the time building something to replace it, something fluid, dynamic and capable of good government, Violent struggle is often instigated by the state itself because it helps the state to empower itself in the name of security. Terrorism is a losing tactic adopted by losers or 'useful idiots' employed by the state and unknowingly helping the state.
brother I am talking about the real original Muslim brotherhood under Imam Hassan al Banna Shaheed (ra) from 1928 onwards.

I am definitely not talking about the Qutbists that you are thinking about - who are on a different methodology entirely.
kertionderf is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:35 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity