DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - What do the scholars say about Shaykh Imran Hosein?

**ViagraPriceBuying** · 08-03-2012, 06:37 AM

"He thinks that Paper currency is Haram " that is a BIG BIG BIG pointer that he is on the right path. Whichever person in a position of islamic authority, peer, ulema etc.. who asks/accepts monetary donations for himself is FAKE. e.g. if an imam asks for x amount (reasonable) for nikah that is o.k. but same imam says give me x amount I will do dua for you=fake/non-muslim.

Wallah, Alhumdullilah. it's quite hard to break free of the illusion of the reality of money in our modern world, even the most educated ulema of our times are unaware of this aspect of things. i only know becasue I was obsessed with illumanati/freemason (they don't technically exist).

One big clue to the above is the current/recent banking crisis. Also the USA the richest country is nearly $15,000,000,000,000 ($15 trillion)in debt. think about it.

think more....Arabia under control of the ibn saud family (saudi arabia) is in debt of about $85 billion, this is more than countries like pakistan, bangladesh and south africa. I wonder if this debt is without interest. i doubt it. but that's ok they are "non-bidatees".

Imran Hosein himself says his methodoligy in his interpretation of such hadith is to concentrate on symbolism while other ulema take hadith related to the end of days literally.

You have to understand that for example many modern/futuristic concepts would be quite hard to explain at the time of the prophet(pbuh) without symbolism.

it's funny how people are trying to lump him into a certain group so they know how to attack him.

08-03-2012, 06:37 AM	#2
ViagraPriceBuying Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 415 Senior Member	"He thinks that Paper currency is Haram " that is a BIG BIG BIG pointer that he is on the right path. Whichever person in a position of islamic authority, peer, ulema etc.. who asks/accepts monetary donations for himself is FAKE. e.g. if an imam asks for x amount (reasonable) for nikah that is o.k. but same imam says give me x amount I will do dua for you=fake/non-muslim. Wallah, Alhumdullilah. it's quite hard to break free of the illusion of the reality of money in our modern world, even the most educated ulema of our times are unaware of this aspect of things. i only know becasue I was obsessed with illumanati/freemason (they don't technically exist). One big clue to the above is the current/recent banking crisis. Also the USA the richest country is nearly $15,000,000,000,000 ($15 trillion)in debt. think about it. think more....Arabia under control of the ibn saud family (saudi arabia) is in debt of about $85 billion, this is more than countries like pakistan, bangladesh and south africa. I wonder if this debt is without interest. i doubt it. but that's ok they are "non-bidatees". Imran Hosein himself says his methodoligy in his interpretation of such hadith is to concentrate on symbolism while other ulema take hadith related to the end of days literally. You have to understand that for example many modern/futuristic concepts would be quite hard to explain at the time of the prophet(pbuh) without symbolism. it's funny how people are trying to lump him into a certain group so they know how to attack him.
	Quote