DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - OIC has now lost credibility: Its a Saudi , Israeli & American tool

**EvonsRorgon** · 09-04-2012, 04:22 AM

Game Theory

You like to jump all over the place don't you.

I speak about Bahrain and Iran.

You answer me with why did the Saudis not abandon Ben Ali and Mubarak? Why did the Saudis not intervene in Darfur?

Deal with Iran first and its persecution of Sunni Islam and continued imprisonment and assassination of Sunni leaders.

Deal with the Rafidite Shiahs drilling holes in Sunni heads with electric drills in Iraq.

Deal with the Rafidite Shiah gangs from Lebanon and Iraq doing terrible things to Sunnis right now in Syria.

The disgraceful King of Saudi Arabia didn't waste a chance to prove to us that he is an enemy of fellow Muslims.

He was the only one to offer Ben Ali, the toppled Tunisian autocrat a safe haven.

If he had any conscience, he would have prosecuted Ben Ali for his crimes against our dear Tunisian Muslim Brothers, but this didn't happen because he was happy to please Israel. The King of Saudi Arabia, Mubarak, Saleh, Gaddaffi, Assad are all Kleptocrats in that region and they are the main enemies of the Muslim masses.

To begin with the Saudi King was upset by Obama's abandonment of Mubarak. After Mubarak was ousted, he virtually blackmailed the Military Council ruling Egypt to save Mubarak from trial.

Now that Mubarak and his family are facing justice, the Saudi King must be even more annoyed and terrified that power hungry dictators like him will be held accountable for their crimes against Muslims and the world.

Where was OIC when Bashir was slaughtering Muslims in Darfur? Where was this Saudi king?

to the rest of us, Saudi Arabia is often a source of embarrassment.

Everyone knows the King has a problem with the 21st Century. Human rights to him is an evil invention of poor, tortured people and how on earth could he take their word for it. Let's face it, it's not like they have an unbiased opinion. Well, they would say that, wouldn’t they? It is an obvious conflict of interest. As the King famously said on being questioned on his human rights abuses, "Torture never hurt anyone".

I rest my case.

09-04-2012, 04:22 AM	#19
EvonsRorgon Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 438 Senior Member	Game Theory You like to jump all over the place don't you. I speak about Bahrain and Iran. You answer me with why did the Saudis not abandon Ben Ali and Mubarak? Why did the Saudis not intervene in Darfur? Deal with Iran first and its persecution of Sunni Islam and continued imprisonment and assassination of Sunni leaders. Deal with the Rafidite Shiahs drilling holes in Sunni heads with electric drills in Iraq. Deal with the Rafidite Shiah gangs from Lebanon and Iraq doing terrible things to Sunnis right now in Syria. The disgraceful King of Saudi Arabia didn't waste a chance to prove to us that he is an enemy of fellow Muslims. He was the only one to offer Ben Ali, the toppled Tunisian autocrat a safe haven. If he had any conscience, he would have prosecuted Ben Ali for his crimes against our dear Tunisian Muslim Brothers, but this didn't happen because he was happy to please Israel. The King of Saudi Arabia, Mubarak, Saleh, Gaddaffi, Assad are all Kleptocrats in that region and they are the main enemies of the Muslim masses. To begin with the Saudi King was upset by Obama's abandonment of Mubarak. After Mubarak was ousted, he virtually blackmailed the Military Council ruling Egypt to save Mubarak from trial. Now that Mubarak and his family are facing justice, the Saudi King must be even more annoyed and terrified that power hungry dictators like him will be held accountable for their crimes against Muslims and the world. Where was OIC when Bashir was slaughtering Muslims in Darfur? Where was this Saudi king? to the rest of us, Saudi Arabia is often a source of embarrassment. Everyone knows the King has a problem with the 21st Century. Human rights to him is an evil invention of poor, tortured people and how on earth could he take their word for it. Let's face it, it's not like they have an unbiased opinion. Well, they would say that, wouldn’t they? It is an obvious conflict of interest. As the King famously said on being questioned on his human rights abuses, "Torture never hurt anyone". I rest my case.
	Quote