DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Muslim Americans Must Obey U.S. Laws; Nidal Hasan Disobeyed Islamic Doctrine

**ImapFidaarram** · 09-04-2012, 03:22 AM

i did not say that it wasnt one of the reasons. i am saying it wasnt the only reason.

i doubt it is my wishful thinking:
"During his psychiatry fellowship at USUHS, Air Force Lt. Col. Dr. Val Finnell, a graduate school classmate in the MPH program, said that while other students' projects focused on topics such as water contamination, Hasan's project dealt with "whether the war on terror is a war against Islam." According to retired Colonel Terry Lee, "He said 'maybe Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor'. At first we thought he meant help the armed forces, but apparently that wasn't the case. Other times he would make comments we shouldn't be in the war in the first place."

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/nov...rt-hood-hasan7
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,572405,00.html

he was in contact with sh. al-awlaki. if you can find a way (hint:ultrasurf) to read those links you would see what the sheikh says and why every Muslim who accepts the sheikh's teachings does exactly what major nidal did.

I had read these things at that time. Even at that time I got no impression that Major Hasan was on a mission of any kind. He simply displayed a Muslim mindset which can see through some of the American rhetoric. Nothing more than that.

Ok let us say that you are right. You are saying that as a resident of Pakistan you can kill or attack any or all Pakistanis because the state of Pakistan is aiding Americans in killing Muslims?

Or only the Pakistani military can be rightly attacked?

What if someone attacks the Pakistani military, kills a few hundred soldiers, but then the Pakistani millitary reacts by ruthlessly killing many Muslims in return and further empowering itself as the biggest and baddest bully on the block....what have you achieved?

With regards to killing the military in America...what if the soldiers are forced to go...are they guilty and responsible for it? It is the democratic form of government which allows these things to occur and we have to know where ultimate responsibility lies. Is it with 'the people', or 'the President', or the hidden banker and corporate elites.

The military court will not get to hear my words but I would like to shout that Major Hasan is not guilty. Because of the above circumstances.

09-04-2012, 03:22 AM	#19
ImapFidaarram Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 537 Senior Member	i did not say that it wasnt one of the reasons. i am saying it wasnt the only reason. i doubt it is my wishful thinking: "During his psychiatry fellowship at USUHS, Air Force Lt. Col. Dr. Val Finnell, a graduate school classmate in the MPH program, said that while other students' projects focused on topics such as water contamination, Hasan's project dealt with "whether the war on terror is a war against Islam." According to retired Colonel Terry Lee, "He said 'maybe Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor'. At first we thought he meant help the armed forces, but apparently that wasn't the case. Other times he would make comments we shouldn't be in the war in the first place." http://articles.latimes.com/2009/nov...rt-hood-hasan7 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,572405,00.html he was in contact with sh. al-awlaki. if you can find a way (hint:ultrasurf) to read those links you would see what the sheikh says and why every Muslim who accepts the sheikh's teachings does exactly what major nidal did. I had read these things at that time. Even at that time I got no impression that Major Hasan was on a mission of any kind. He simply displayed a Muslim mindset which can see through some of the American rhetoric. Nothing more than that. Ok let us say that you are right. You are saying that as a resident of Pakistan you can kill or attack any or all Pakistanis because the state of Pakistan is aiding Americans in killing Muslims? Or only the Pakistani military can be rightly attacked? What if someone attacks the Pakistani military, kills a few hundred soldiers, but then the Pakistani millitary reacts by ruthlessly killing many Muslims in return and further empowering itself as the biggest and baddest bully on the block....what have you achieved? With regards to killing the military in America...what if the soldiers are forced to go...are they guilty and responsible for it? It is the democratic form of government which allows these things to occur and we have to know where ultimate responsibility lies. Is it with 'the people', or 'the President', or the hidden banker and corporate elites. The military court will not get to hear my words but I would like to shout that Major Hasan is not guilty. Because of the above circumstances.
	Quote