View Single Post
Old 09-04-2012, 04:22 AM   #22
carfAball

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
599
Senior Member
Default
The unedited video interviews clearly show the scientists views on the matter. For example Bill Hay describes his interview like this

Zindani: If XXXXX would you say it was from the divine being?
Hay: No, because YYYYY
Zindani: What if XXXX and YYYYY were not true?
Hay: No, because ZZZZZ
Zindani, What if XXXXX and YYYYY and ZZZZZ were not true
(and so on)
Hay: Well, in that case I would say it was from the divine being......but you would need a lot of evidence to support your "what if"

Cut out the underlined text and then make a video. In the video you say "When I asked Prof Hay what he thought was the origins of the Quran he replied I would say it was from the divine being"

This is exactly what Prof Hay says in the interview on that channel. He says that Zindani outright distorted the interview. The same with Pete Palmer. Zindani said that Pete Palmer said that the Quran is light from Allah, yet Zindani never shows Palmer saying this and Palmer explicitly states that he said no such thing.

It's not that I am forming a conclusion based on a lack of evidence, it is the opposite. The Zindani footage is clearly edited in a very dodgy looking way, and these interviews are 100% unedited and the scientists themselves claim that the event was trickery.
carfAball is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:46 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity