View Single Post
Old 07-03-2012, 11:34 PM   #27
kimaddison

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
Not as much as Academics or Theocrats…

Democratically elected politicians base their power on Popularity. If they are unpopular then they have no power. So corruption is limited to what is popular, not what is dogmatic. Dogmas tend to be unpopular or traditional. Dogmas are long-term. Politickal popularity is short-term. For example the popularity of a president rises & falls with his media coverage.

Limiting terms of office for politicians reduces short-term corruption in a Democracy.




________________________

That's a good point; but you have to consider the tax rates, expenditures, and returns on taxation in terms of social protection for all.

In a Libertarian society, police & military have a special interest to protect the wealthy and not the poor. In fact there probably would be massive die-offs and murders in the poor class of a Libertarian society. Gangs would rule the streets & ghettos. Because they have no incentives whatsoever to pay for protection after being born into poverty.



But you guys have no nukes; and the Russians would have conquered much more than just East Germany had the US not been a staunch ally of Western Europeans. Economy is one part of a superpower; military and technology is the other part.
Lol

Where are you from?

In the US Congress, there are no term limits. Right now, most conservative politicians won't accept that there's climate change after academia has proven that there is global warming.

There's not much conflict of interest in academia. There's is, however, tons of special interest in government.
kimaddison is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity