DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Swidemaiskikemu** · 06-06-2012, 11:38 PM

white has nothing to do with skin tone or any of that shit. my family is white, i have never really have anyone to dispute this claim. that being said [B]i have family members that are dark complected, darker than some arabs i have met, or atleast on par with them. why then don't i accept these arabs as being white?

Then why use an analogy to the color "white"? Why even call it 'White nationalism' in the first place?

(Also, to say that it has "nothing" to do with skin-color is a bit exaggerated, dont' you think? I don't think you consider a dark person from india 'white' regardless of how european that person's features are, or what culture he/she has.)

because white is a social term, it means "of fully european descent" just as the man on stormfront claims. Give me a fucking break. Just look at the logo; german nazi font in white, Celtic Cross, the name itself, Stormfront (the symbolism of natural elements, such as storms, lightning etc.). You know damn well how much they glorify everything Nordic and Germanic - not to mention whiteness itself; blondeness, fair skin, bright eyes.

lets say you are a 1/16th native american. if you were to not tell anyone about this, we would all assume you were completely white. if you were to tell us you were a 1/16th native american then we would see you as "mostly white*" and for all intents and purposes you would be, No, their definition is 100% euro. Not "mostly white".

but there is always that * there that says "and some indian too". thats not necessarily a bad thing, but it is what it is. as i have said in earlier posts, white is a very very exclusionary term, that was how it was designed. to be a term to seperate the elite from those of what were percieved to be "lesser races" etc. it has since broadened to include a whole host of people, including the irish the germans the italians the greeks and the jews, who were all at one time not considered white. (this also puts a hole in your white=germanic theory as germans and irish are germanic people) but they have been accepted as such now. who knows, maybe one day arabs and the like will also be seen as white, until then though they are not. and there isn't much anyone can do about it. ^ I have no problem with all of that that. I just think it's somewhat hypocritical of them to call all europeans "white" when what they really mean is those of germanic origin.

06-06-2012, 11:38 PM	#10
Swidemaiskikemu Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 439 Senior Member	white has nothing to do with skin tone or any of that shit. my family is white, i have never really have anyone to dispute this claim. that being said [B]i have family members that are dark complected, darker than some arabs i have met, or atleast on par with them. why then don't i accept these arabs as being white? Then why use an analogy to the color "white"? Why even call it 'White nationalism' in the first place? (Also, to say that it has "nothing" to do with skin-color is a bit exaggerated, dont' you think? I don't think you consider a dark person from india 'white' regardless of how european that person's features are, or what culture he/she has.) because white is a social term, it means "of fully european descent" just as the man on stormfront claims. Give me a fucking break. Just look at the logo; german nazi font in white, Celtic Cross, the name itself, Stormfront (the symbolism of natural elements, such as storms, lightning etc.). You know damn well how much they glorify everything Nordic and Germanic - not to mention whiteness itself; blondeness, fair skin, bright eyes. lets say you are a 1/16th native american. if you were to not tell anyone about this, we would all assume you were completely white. if you were to tell us you were a 1/16th native american then we would see you as "mostly white" and for all intents and purposes you would be, No, their definition is 100% euro. Not "mostly white". but there is always that there that says "and some indian too". thats not necessarily a bad thing, but it is what it is. as i have said in earlier posts, white is a very very exclusionary term, that was how it was designed. to be a term to seperate the elite from those of what were percieved to be "lesser races" etc. it has since broadened to include a whole host of people, including the irish the germans the italians the greeks and the jews, who were all at one time not considered white. (this also puts a hole in your white=germanic theory as germans and irish are germanic people) but they have been accepted as such now. who knows, maybe one day arabs and the like will also be seen as white, until then though they are not. and there isn't much anyone can do about it. ^ I have no problem with all of that that. I just think it's somewhat hypocritical of them to call all europeans "white" when what they really mean is those of germanic origin.
	Quote