DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**stuntduood** · 01-30-2011, 03:08 AM

I prefer the burswood option honestly. If a stadium is built outside of Subiaco one option is to downsize Subiaco Oval. Still keep all the offices of the WAFC there and the seats infront of it. Also keep the 3-tier stand and and leave 1-tier at the city end of the ground. The roberts road side of the ground will become like any other WAFL ground with 2-3 rows of normal seating along with a Members Bar. The clubrooms that were occupied by West Coast could then be used by another WAFL team.

Now what I am suggesting is a little bit out there but what if Subiaco were to move back to Subiaco Oval? This then allows West Perth to move back to Leederville. If West Perth opt against this then East Perth would be the sole occupier of the ground.

01-30-2011, 03:08 AM	#7
stuntduood Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 435 Senior Member	I prefer the burswood option honestly. If a stadium is built outside of Subiaco one option is to downsize Subiaco Oval. Still keep all the offices of the WAFC there and the seats infront of it. Also keep the 3-tier stand and and leave 1-tier at the city end of the ground. The roberts road side of the ground will become like any other WAFL ground with 2-3 rows of normal seating along with a Members Bar. The clubrooms that were occupied by West Coast could then be used by another WAFL team. Now what I am suggesting is a little bit out there but what if Subiaco were to move back to Subiaco Oval? This then allows West Perth to move back to Leederville. If West Perth opt against this then East Perth would be the sole occupier of the ground.
	Quote