View Single Post
Old 01-22-2007, 09:31 PM   #34
97dYA9L3

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Geronimo


What is point behind your irony? Are you saying that the dangers of fallout from a limited number of nuclear strikes are not in fact exaggerated or are you responding to perceived advocacy on my part of engaging in limited nuclear wars?

If it is for the latter not only will I state for the record that I find the idea of resumption of use of nuclear weapons in warfare dangerous and appalling but I would also point out that no where in any of my posts have I even hinted that I think contemplation of use of nuclear weapons is acceptable. I'm suggesting that the real danger from a limited nuclear strike isn't the actual radio-active fallout, it's the precedent that it sets in terms of acceptability of use of nuclear weapons.
97dYA9L3 is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:08 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity