DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**r5YOPDyk** · 05-05-2012, 05:30 PM

Uh, no.. It didn't.

GHWB's inherent weakness as a candidate got us Clinton.

Because WHY WOULD SOMEONE vote for Perot in the first place when they could choose a FANTASTIC candidate like GHWB?

Answer? Because he sucked.. He sucked, and the vacuum of his suckdom created Perot.. Gave him an opportunity he never should have had, and buoyed him.

wrong hoffa, the vast majority of perot voters would have voted for bush over clinton. clinton won with 44% of the votes. perot elected clinton, there is no confusion over that fact.

05-05-2012, 05:30 PM	#23
r5YOPDyk Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 442 Senior Member	Uh, no.. It didn't. GHWB's inherent weakness as a candidate got us Clinton. Because WHY WOULD SOMEONE vote for Perot in the first place when they could choose a FANTASTIC candidate like GHWB? Answer? Because he sucked.. He sucked, and the vacuum of his suckdom created Perot.. Gave him an opportunity he never should have had, and buoyed him. wrong hoffa, the vast majority of perot voters would have voted for bush over clinton. clinton won with 44% of the votes. perot elected clinton, there is no confusion over that fact.
	Quote