DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Why Santorum supporters should switch to Paul

**Anypeny** · 04-17-2012, 04:13 AM

http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/12/wh...witch-to-paul/

"Most Republicans who hold faith, family values and life as top priorities when selecting a candidate also want to seriously cut spending and reduce government. These folks accounted for most of Santorum’s support. Ron Paul is a conservative whose limited-government record is irrefutable — but who is also a devout Christian, 100% pro-life and has been married to the same woman for 50 years. In Paul, conservatives are rid of some of the things that made Santorum less attractive — big spending, government growth — but also have a candidate who has been a lifelong social conservative in more ways than many Republicans realize..."

Logical fallacy... I don't give a fuck what ron paul has done to prove he's a pro-life, anti-gay, Christian warrior... his beliefs are retarded. "States rights" would make any moral attempt will fall apart. How far do you think "state's rights" will go? What's the point of being against homosexuality, against abortion, or against anything... if they can just vote differently in another state?

It's a delusion. Conservative libertarians are delusional fuckwits, living in an autistic dream world... where "it's not bad as long as it isn't in front of me". You want to live your lives, in denial... and that's why you've lost everything. You have no rights, your job sucks, your lives are worthless and without meaning, your kids are ugly and stupid, and you're going to die.

If something is good, then it should be spread outward... to everybody. A good system, and upstanding morals, should not be isolated. Nor if something is bad, should you keep it specified to your neck of the woods. If it's bad, it's bad everywhere. And you are only proving yourself to be a shortsighted, hypocritical, self-destructive moron... by not noticing this.

You want democracy? Fine. You want totalitarianism? Fine. You want anarchy? Fine.

But don't fucking tell me it's good for some, but not others. "Some animals are more equal then others..." Everyone should be treated equally good, or equally bad. Live by the same standards, that way we can at least say we have equality if not liberty. Those that undermine equality, never seem to give a fuck about liberty. Which is why I'm having to fight this battle against internet censorship alone... because everyone thinks they live inside a vacuum, where nothing effects them, it's perfectly fine someone, somewhere is being oppressed and bullied... so long as they don't have to know about it.

Einstein said evil prevails when good men do nothing. I'd go a step further in suggesting evil men do nothing... If you refuse to stand up for what is right, apply your morals universally, and take action. Then you are evil.

04-17-2012, 04:13 AM	#13
Anypeny Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 506 Senior Member	http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/12/wh...witch-to-paul/ "Most Republicans who hold faith, family values and life as top priorities when selecting a candidate also want to seriously cut spending and reduce government. These folks accounted for most of Santorum’s support. Ron Paul is a conservative whose limited-government record is irrefutable — but who is also a devout Christian, 100% pro-life and has been married to the same woman for 50 years. In Paul, conservatives are rid of some of the things that made Santorum less attractive — big spending, government growth — but also have a candidate who has been a lifelong social conservative in more ways than many Republicans realize..." Logical fallacy... I don't give a fuck what ron paul has done to prove he's a pro-life, anti-gay, Christian warrior... his beliefs are retarded. "States rights" would make any moral attempt will fall apart. How far do you think "state's rights" will go? What's the point of being against homosexuality, against abortion, or against anything... if they can just vote differently in another state? It's a delusion. Conservative libertarians are delusional fuckwits, living in an autistic dream world... where "it's not bad as long as it isn't in front of me". You want to live your lives, in denial... and that's why you've lost everything. You have no rights, your job sucks, your lives are worthless and without meaning, your kids are ugly and stupid, and you're going to die. If something is good, then it should be spread outward... to everybody. A good system, and upstanding morals, should not be isolated. Nor if something is bad, should you keep it specified to your neck of the woods. If it's bad, it's bad everywhere. And you are only proving yourself to be a shortsighted, hypocritical, self-destructive moron... by not noticing this. You want democracy? Fine. You want totalitarianism? Fine. You want anarchy? Fine. But don't fucking tell me it's good for some, but not others. "Some animals are more equal then others..." Everyone should be treated equally good, or equally bad. Live by the same standards, that way we can at least say we have equality if not liberty. Those that undermine equality, never seem to give a fuck about liberty. Which is why I'm having to fight this battle against internet censorship alone... because everyone thinks they live inside a vacuum, where nothing effects them, it's perfectly fine someone, somewhere is being oppressed and bullied... so long as they don't have to know about it. Einstein said evil prevails when good men do nothing. I'd go a step further in suggesting evil men do nothing... If you refuse to stand up for what is right, apply your morals universally, and take action. Then you are evil.
	Quote