View Single Post
Old 03-02-2012, 10:30 PM   #11
BodoidearoLew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
331
Senior Member
Default
No, it's based on bias in the workplace, on limited opportunities for women and girls because of their gender. I won't go through my Set Designer's Union story all over again. Growing up a male most likely post the establishment of Feminism, you may not be personally aware of this.
So it is about vicimhood. This despite the fact that women suffer no detriment professionally. 52% of management positions in my own country are now occupied by women. Women also work less hours and take more sickness leave. All this, and they're somehow 'oppressed'. But feminism goes waaaay the hell beyond workplace bullshit, to encompass every last facet of societal operation.

Can you tell me precisely what those considerations are? If indeed one can be 'precise' about so fundamental and all-pervasive a quality as absolute impunity. Women are basically unaccountable. They're afforded a far greater level of leniency in criminal proceedings; suffering nothing like the extent of incarceration as men do for the same crimes, and enjoy more leeway in divorce courts and during custody proceedings. They are always basically 'victims'. Even when they're not (perhaps especially then). And the law supports that view, for fear of being labelled as somehow misogynistic.

They are considerations from Mr.M and are most definitely based on gender. Is MrM a savage and brutal oppressor?
BodoidearoLew is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity