DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**wllsqyuipknczx** · 02-04-2012, 11:53 PM

I wouldn't call it an assumption at all.

Karl Rove and Ari Fleischer are covering the Republican primaries as "experts". The same people are still calling the shots for the GOP as ten years ago.

And yet these 'experts' neither represent the public perception (who aren't experts), nor influence the ballot.

It's the usual case of spin doctors telling us what we believe, and the public rarely agrees. Would they even understand?

02-04-2012, 11:53 PM	#5
wllsqyuipknczx Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 462 Senior Member	I wouldn't call it an assumption at all. Karl Rove and Ari Fleischer are covering the Republican primaries as "experts". The same people are still calling the shots for the GOP as ten years ago. And yet these 'experts' neither represent the public perception (who aren't experts), nor influence the ballot. It's the usual case of spin doctors telling us what we believe, and the public rarely agrees. Would they even understand?
	Quote