DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Jadykeery** · 10-07-2011, 12:25 AM

Now who could that under 30% be?

People with money they felt was at risk.. Pensions, etc.

They'd rather socialize their losses, and make the rest of us pay for their stupidity, than admit that they fucked up and no one (especially the terminally stupid) has a right to a return on their investment.

10-07-2011, 12:25 AM	#21
Jadykeery Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 394 Senior Member	Now who could that under 30% be? People with money they felt was at risk.. Pensions, etc. They'd rather socialize their losses, and make the rest of us pay for their stupidity, than admit that they fucked up and no one (especially the terminally stupid) has a right to a return on their investment.
	Quote