DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - A British View of the 1943 Bombing of Hamburg

**Ambrakam** · 09-21-2011, 02:43 AM

He's villified for invading a string of peaceful nations that were no threat to Germany. One after the next. He's villified because he was a fascist dictator, hell bent upon military domination and expansionism.

Also, there were no troops in Stalin's way. That's simply not true. Even if it was, they would have been the same one's opposing Germany, and that certainly never discouraged Hitler.

Should we make a list of every known leader who invaded other nations that were no threat to them? What makes Hitler so much worse than the rest? Germany lost the war and Hitler said mean things about Jews and nothing more.

Yes, it simply is true and also it's simply true that those troops stayed there for over half a century to keep the Soviets from advancing any further.

09-21-2011, 02:43 AM	#40
Ambrakam Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 327 Senior Member	He's villified for invading a string of peaceful nations that were no threat to Germany. One after the next. He's villified because he was a fascist dictator, hell bent upon military domination and expansionism. Also, there were no troops in Stalin's way. That's simply not true. Even if it was, they would have been the same one's opposing Germany, and that certainly never discouraged Hitler. Should we make a list of every known leader who invaded other nations that were no threat to them? What makes Hitler so much worse than the rest? Germany lost the war and Hitler said mean things about Jews and nothing more. Yes, it simply is true and also it's simply true that those troops stayed there for over half a century to keep the Soviets from advancing any further.
	Quote