So does that mean as a general rule the Woman should have to go to extreme means to prove that her life is in danger to get such a procedure, and the general rule should be that the mother must provide life support, and birth the fetus without extensive medical proof it will kill her? So what about Mothers who die in childbirth who's doctors told her she would be ok? If a Mother feels that her child is going to kill her, yet can't prove it medically, is she put to death? I simply don't agree with that. This is not a question of a right to life, it's a question of the rights of which life, because you can't have both. If a Woman is raped, does that rape baby, with the rapists genes, now have the right to incubate inside of her, leeching off of her body disfiguring her through no choice of her own? There are a million reasons why an abortion could be the right thing, and while practicality is the biggest one, there are enough good reasons why abortion can be helpful that it should be readily available and legal.