DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - ACORN: Housing Assistance For Prostitutes

**poulaMahmah** · 09-10-2009, 09:09 PM

I'm still utterly mind****ed about why you keep talking about lawyers. YES, this person is not a lawyer, SO WHY DO YOU KEEP TALKING ABOUT THEM.

If you wish to try to impress my **** with your legal knowledge it will not work -- it is averse to women and legal mumbojumbo. Talk geek to me or stay on topic if you wish to get into my pants.

I understand this person has no legal protections and is probably breaking the law. This is completely irrelevant to my points, which you seem to agree with anyway.

FOCUS.

It's pretty simple really: your post argued that this was just par for the course in the field of tax advice. My response was that if even lawyers can't do it, then it's even less likely that "tax specialists" can do it, so it's not par for the course. Your response was clarifying that you'd always assumed that such conduct is both unethical and criminal, and that you're only talking about people who don't get caught, even though your earlier post wasn't clear on that. My response was agreeing 100% subject to that assumption. What's the problem?

09-10-2009, 09:09 PM	#12
poulaMahmah Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 478 Senior Member	I'm still utterly mind**ed about why you keep talking about lawyers. YES, this person is not a lawyer, SO WHY DO YOU KEEP TALKING ABOUT THEM. If you wish to try to impress my ** with your legal knowledge it will not work -- it is averse to women and legal mumbojumbo. Talk geek to me or stay on topic if you wish to get into my pants. I understand this person has no legal protections and is probably breaking the law. This is completely irrelevant to my points, which you seem to agree with anyway. FOCUS. It's pretty simple really: your post argued that this was just par for the course in the field of tax advice. My response was that if even lawyers can't do it, then it's even less likely that "tax specialists" can do it, so it's not par for the course. Your response was clarifying that you'd always assumed that such conduct is both unethical and criminal, and that you're only talking about people who don't get caught, even though your earlier post wasn't clear on that. My response was agreeing 100% subject to that assumption. What's the problem?
	Quote