DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Yfclciak** · 04-23-2010, 12:21 AM

Maybe I'm odd in as much as I'd rather none of those people (stoners and the people you listed) be driving? Perhaps you can explain to me how the presence of one danger on the road means I should be comfortable with all of them being on the road.

And where did I say I was comfortable with or I wanted stoners on the road... I did say that given a choice, I'd rather see somebody driving at 20 MPH in city traffic because they were high vs morons who were paying more attention to something else while doing 50 MPH. But my statement NEVER condoned getting high and driving.

04-23-2010, 12:21 AM	#23
Yfclciak Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 490 Senior Member	Maybe I'm odd in as much as I'd rather none of those people (stoners and the people you listed) be driving? Perhaps you can explain to me how the presence of one danger on the road means I should be comfortable with all of them being on the road. And where did I say I was comfortable with or I wanted stoners on the road... I did say that given a choice, I'd rather see somebody driving at 20 MPH in city traffic because they were high vs morons who were paying more attention to something else while doing 50 MPH. But my statement NEVER condoned getting high and driving.
	Quote