DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Pateeffelty** · 04-14-2010, 07:20 PM

I edited this:

I should note: killing a helpless (as in, cannot fight back) person who is about to kill innocent people is ok. Killing and beating for the defense of the weak is fine. I should have always noted with helpless a perhaps more important quality, harmless.

The child is not only helpless (unable to fight back) but harmless (not in the act of harming anyone).

Every government kills people? That's irrelevant. Killing people who would harm others for sure (and collateral damage) that serves the greater good is fine.

Not all governments have capital punishment, killing helpless and harmless people on purpose.

04-14-2010, 07:20 PM	#27
Pateeffelty Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 423 Senior Member	I edited this: I should note: killing a helpless (as in, cannot fight back) person who is about to kill innocent people is ok. Killing and beating for the defense of the weak is fine. I should have always noted with helpless a perhaps more important quality, harmless. The child is not only helpless (unable to fight back) but harmless (not in the act of harming anyone). Every government kills people? That's irrelevant. Killing people who would harm others for sure (and collateral damage) that serves the greater good is fine. Not all governments have capital punishment, killing helpless and harmless people on purpose.
	Quote